Placidus is a Renaissance-era way of estimating homes based on the passage of time. It works by recording the house cusps in two-hour intervals from your birth time. The cusp of the 1st house is marked by the degree of the zodiac sign rising on the Eastern Horizon at the moment of your birth.
In This Article...
Is there a distinction between Placidus and complete signs?
Robert Hand’s booklet seemed convincing to me. He discusses the history of the entire sign house system in it. Now, I openly acknowledge that I did not conduct extensive additional investigation. I was already reading Firmicus Maternus and looking into other older astrological traditions at the time. However, I did not conduct extensive research.
Hand recommends spending some time exploring the charts you’re working with in both a quadrant-based system, such as Placidus or Koch, and the entire sign system, and then comparing the findings.
Chris Brennan, who also uses whole sign houses, was introduced to me at this meeting. Even while other astrologers I respect and admire, such as Lee Lehman, John Frawley, Lynn Bell, and Deb Houlding, didn’t, I knew Demetra George did. As I write this, I realize there are other astrologers whose work I love, and I’m not sure what house system they use off the top of my head.
I didn’t immediately start messing around with entire sign houses. It took me a bit to get my head around some of the philosophical concepts of switching housing systems. In the end, I followed Hand’s advice and began running charts for clients through both Placidus and Whole Signs to see whether there were any changes.
For nearly 18 months, I did this. It was a little perplexing because I had to think twice about each chart. The house system switch didn’t make much of a difference in certain charts, but it did in others.
Over time, I discovered that employing the entire sign house system to delineate issues in the birth chart gave me consistently greater insights.
This means that when I wanted to talk about something specific to the client, like children or fertility, the 5th sign from the ascendant seemed to constantly bring clearer insights.
The 5th house cusp is in the 5th sign from the ascendant in some Placidus charts, but in other Placidus charts, it is in the 4th or 6th sign from the ascendant. Rather of counting houses, you can figure this out by counting signs from your ascendant.
The house cusps are the sign cusps themselves, as each sign becomes the house.
This means that, while the Ascendant degree is still important and has all of the meaning you might expect, it is no longer the degree that marks the first house’s cusp, but rather a floating degree that rests somewhere inside the first house.
The other angular points, such as the Asc, Dsc, Mc, and IC, are still essential, especially for calculating planetary strength, but they float around inside a house rather than marking the cusp.
The MC degree can fall in the 8th, 9th, 11th, or 12th whole sign houses because the MC can be in any sign other than the 10th sign around from the Ascendant. When viewed from the perspective of a quadrant chart, this may appear strange, but it does provide more interpretive information.
If the MC degree is in the 9th house, for example, it indicates that the MC is focused on 9th house themes or will assist in the manifestation of 9th house themes. Perhaps the individual works in education or travel, or at their company’s or business’s foreign arm. Alternatively, they could be someone whose work revolves upon the quest of wisdom.
Here’s an example of Prince William’s horoscope, in which the MC degree is in the ascendant’s 12th sign. This could indicate that one’s career is focused on 12th house themes or activities. Working in a charity, working with those who are spiritually, emotionally, or mentally suffering, or working behind the scenes to support the success of others, depending on the sign(s) and planet(s) involved, this could mean working in a charity, working with those who are spiritually, emotionally, or mentally suffering. It could entail working in an environment that requires retreat or separation from society, such as a hospital, prison, retreat center, or other facility where individuals seek health and recovery (addiction treatment centre for instance).
By 2015, I was mostly working in full-service sign shops. I loved the philosophical integrity of how the signs connected to the ascendant, and how this seemed to better mirror the manifestation of each of the houses’ associated issues.
Wade Caves and Lee Lehman co-taught a horary intensive in Toronto in 2016, which I attended.
Lee and I were having a little conversation about house systems over dinner one night, and I was describing how I believed that life topics translated through the entire sign chart seemed clearer and more relevant than a quadrant system like Placidus.
The signs are linked to houses in a regular order throughout the sign system, so if Gemini is on the first house, Cancer is on the second, Leo is on the third, and so on. Because houses in Placidus might be greater than 30 degrees, a sign may be skipped as the house ruler on occasion.
In Placidus, for example, it’s conceivable to have a Gemini Ascendant and then a Leo on the second house, resulting in the third sign ruling the second house. Interceptions are the result of this. Cancer would be stopped in this scenario.
The same informationthe constant sign/pairingwould show up in the Equal house system, as the sign/house pairings would be the same in both the Equal and Whole Sign house systems, as both create sign/house combinations from the ascendant.
The ascendant’s degree becomes the degree of all the house cusps in the Equal house system, whereas in the entire sign system, all the house cusps are 0 degrees. The MC degree, like the complete sign, floats inside whichever house it falls into in the Equal house system. The topic of conversation changed, but the memory of that brief exchange lingered in my mind.
While my purpose here is not to take sides in the discussion or even to try to shape it, Tony Howard has been asking me for months to write something about why I converted to full sign homes, to help explain it to my students and clients, many of whom have accompanied me on this trip.
Thank you so much for your patience and support, if that’s you! I haven’t been compelled to write about it until now, three years after I made the move, because I’ve been too busy investigating the ‘new to me’ method in sessions and classes.
I understand how strange it is when someone you’ve studied or consulted with makes a substantial change in their practice, which leads to a slew of new concerns and debates. I’ve had a lot of conversations with students and clients about things like “what happens if the Sun is in the 8th house instead of the 7th,” or “what happens if the Moon is in the 11th house instead of the 12th.”
The answers to these fascinating questions transcend beyond the discussion over house systems and into how you approach chart work. These discussions have allowed me to gain a better grasp of birth charts and how they function.
These days, I only work in the sign house system as a whole. However, I spent the first ten years of my career in Placidus and Regiomontanus.
I still have clients and students who are really comfortable with their Placidus charts and prefer to work with me in that manner, which I am pleased to do.
I consider my duty as someone who, to the best of my ability, delivers insight, direction, and knowledge derived from your astrology chart in the most meaningful and relevant ways for you, as my client or pupil.
While house systems are significant, astrology is even more so, regardless of the house system you choose.
My four-part ‘Introduction to Traditional Astrology’ seminar will guide you through the exploration of entire sign houses as well as other significant traditional astrology approaches.
PS Ryhan Butler recently started a discussion on Twitter on the various housing systems. This can be found here.
Why is Placidus so well-known?
In Episode 244, Anthony Louis talks about how Placidus became the most prevalent quadrant house division system in modern western astrology.
Placidus is the most popular house system in late twentieth and early twenty-first century astrology, and it is usually the default house system in most software applications, making it the system with which most individuals begin their study of astrology.
The question is, how did this happen in the first place? What led to Placidus’ general popularity, especially given there are alternative varieties of quadrant house division accessible, such as Porphyry or Alcabitius houses?
The Placidus house system and its popularization may be traced back to the 17th century, and it was founded in part on an attempt to understand a contentious passage from the work of 2nd century astrologer Claudius Ptolemy.
An item on Anthony’s blog titled Why are Placidus Houses so Popular? sparked this conversation.
The purpose of this post was to discuss some of the issues raised in that post and to delve deeper into some of them in order to better understand the history of house division.
While our last episode on the roots of the many forms of house division in ancient astrology addressed the early history of house division, the goal of this episode is to fill in some gaps on the later history of house division from the Renaissance era to the present day.
You can learn more about Anthony by visiting his website:
We utilized an extensive set of show notes as the outline for our discussion, which you can find here.
At the bottom of the page, you’ll find audio and video versions of this episode.
Episode Outline and Show Notes
Here’s a portion of the outline we drew out in advance of this episode:
- Based on Anthony’s blog post Why Are Placidus Houses So Popular? from November 2019.
- “Placidus: The Default Darling of Domification,” in Federation of Australian Astrologers Journal, Vol 49, No 2 (June 2019), pp. 21-26, is a follow-up to the original paper.
- The following is the discussion’s premise:
- Placidus is the most common house system in late twentieth and early twenty-first century astrology.
- In Western astrology today.
- Most software packages, such as Astro.com, use it as the default house system.
- As a result, it is the system that most individuals begin with.
- Why is Placidus the default quadrant system, one of the questions that arises?
- Holden mentions that Placidus became the default because he was available:
- “It has become a cliche in the twentieth century that the Placidus system became the standard in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries because it was the only one for which affordable tables were easily available.” This is partially accurate, but the same could be said of the Regiomantanus system’s initial success. A History of Horoscopic Astrology, by Holden, p. 150.
- Because Placidus had been promoted earlier, Anthony took exception to this.
- Because it had been heavily marketed from the 17th century, it was the principal system available by the 20th century.
- So, how did all of this begin?
- Placidus’ book was first published in 1650.
- Primary directions and home division were the focus.
- He was eager to piece together Ptolemy’s strategy.
- Part of a broader return to Ptolemy movement.
- Lilly and others have shown this as well.
- The oldest Greek author available was Ptolemy.
- It is thought to be the most authoritative.
- In his chapter on the length of life, Ptolemy discusses house partition (3, 11).
- He also introduces the basic directions here.
- The technique of house partition he suggests here has been a source of contention for a long time.
- “This one chapter has sparked more astrological debate than any other in history.” A History, by Holden, p. 47.
- Ptolemy was his generation’s Einstein.
- There were conflicting interpretations of the system of house division Ptolemy was aiming to present in this chapter even among early Greek authors after Ptolemy.
- Ptolemy’s interpretation led to some of the later forms of dwellings.
- One of the authors that did this was Regiomantanus.
- “Regiomontanus claimed that his method was inspired by Ptolemy’s Tetrabiblos, iii. 10.” Although this is undoubtedly erroneous, the majority of astrologers accepted Regiomontanus’ reasoning. Ancient House Division II, Holden.
- “His house tables, which were accompanied by auxiliary tables for computing principal directions, were most certainly the first substantial set of mathematical tables of any kind ever written, appearing only four decades after printing was invented.”
- “The Regiomontanus system was successful because of three factors. For starters, it gave a printable set of home tables. Second, it was technologically advanced and scientific. Third, it replaced a system allegedly developed by a medieval Arab with one allegedly sanctioned by classical Greece. These arguments, however, may have been used to either the Campanus or Placidus systems. As a result, it is reasonable to conclude that the Regiomontanus system’s success was attributable to external circumstances rather than any inherent superiority.
- Another author, Placidus, popularized a method based on his interpretation of Ptolemy’s meaning.
- Placidus was notable because he is regarded to have been one of the first in centuries to comprehend Ptolemy’s theory of primary directions.
- He, on the other hand, misread Ptolemy’s planned house partition system.
- At least, that’s what Holden claims.
- Ptolemy, according to Holden and Schmidt, was essentially describing equal dwellings.
- With ranges that start 5 degrees above the Ascendant’s cusp.
- At first, Hephaistio describes it in this way.
- However, Pancharius, an older commentator, interpreted it differently.
- A modified “Alchabitius style” was introduced (Holden says “modified Porphyry).
- As a result of Ptolemy’s interpretations, different house systems have emerged.
- This is why Holden dubbed this the most contentious chapter in astrology history.
- Despite the fact that the Placidus system retains his name, it is possible that it was not the first time it was used.
- In the 12th century, Ibn Ezra recounts a similar strategy.
- Magini “is said to have described it,” according to Holden on page 162, and Placidus “probably could have gotten the idea from reading his book.”
- There was precedent, but it was popularized by Placidus.
- Placidus’ Influence
- Because Lilly’s Christian Astrology was published after Placidus, it had no bearing.
- Regiomantanus residences were utilized by Lilly (1602-1681), as well as his followers John Gadbury (1627-1704) and Henry Coley (1627-1704). (1633-1707).
- Late in his life, the Catholic Church forbade Placidus’ work.
- Placidus was added to the Church’s Index of Forbidden Books in 1687 (the same year Kirby & Bishop released their abbreviated translation), and the ban was renewed in 1709.
- As a result, Placidus became mostly available and popular in Protestant England.
- Perhaps because it was regarded as a novel or radical reinterpretation.
- To improve the procedures, recovering lost wisdom that had been hidden is necessary.
- Placidus ‘desired no other guides than Ptolemy and Reason,’ according to his arguably most famous declaration. Primary Directions, by Gansten, p. 19.
- It grew in popularity quickly (?)
- In many ways, it’s similar to the recent popularity of entire sign houses in our day.
- There was an early English translation of Placidus’ work.
- Kirby and Bishop released The Marrow of Astrology in 1687, a condensed English translation of Placidus’ magnum opus (1650).
- John Partridge (1644-1715) was the most vocal supporter of Placidus homes.
- It wasn’t in his first book, An Astrological Vade Mecum (1679), which includes tables of Regio houses, but in his second Opus Reformatum (1693), in which “he repudiated the teachings of medieval astrologers in favor of Ptolemy and Placidus” (Gansten, Primary Directions, p. 21).
- An outspoken supporter
- He was the 17th century’s last famous English astrologer.
- In 1821, R.C. Smith (‘Raphael’) released a popular astrological almanac containing Placidus house tables, making the Placidus method widely available.
- “It appears likely that he did so because the Placidus method yields cusps that are complex to calculate when referring to any one specific sidereal time, but which are quite simple to produce in table form,” says Ralph William Holden (1977). (The Elements of House Division, p.91).
- Placidus became the most common system among English-speaking astrologers after that.
- The Regiomontanus house tables were removed from Lilly’s book, which was reissued in abbreviated form.
- Zadkiel’s edition (1852)
- Zadkiel’s importance grew as the original edition of Lilly went out of print.
- Placidus was adopted by Alan Leo because it was the standard of practice in late-nineteenth-century England.
- Placidus was commonly used by astrologers in the early twentieth century.
- Placidus became the most widely used system for which tables of homes were accessible.
- To compute cusps on a chart by hand, you’ll need a table of houses.
- It makes some of the math easier to understand.
- In what is already a time-consuming procedure.
- Astrologers also don’t have a lot of experience with astronomy.
- Placidus became the default astrologer with the introduction of computerized astrology and websites.
- This indicates that this is the first system you will use.
- The interpretations’ accuracy or inaccuracy is then partially determined by it.
- Going against this typically entails rejecting what you’ve already learned.
- These are some of the factors that contributed to Placidus becoming the most popular home system in modern times.
What is astrology’s equal house system?
Although the houses are measured out in 30 degree increments starting from the degree of the ascendant, the ecliptic is divided into twelve divisions of 30 degrees in the equal house method. It starts with the ascendant, which works as the 1st house’s ‘cusp’ or starting point, then the second house begins 30 degrees later in zodiacal order, then the third house begins 30 degrees later in zodiacal order from the second house, and so on. Equal house proponents believe that in higher latitudes (particularly above 60 degrees), it is more accurate and less misleading than the Placidean and other quadrant house systems.
In astrology, which house system is the best?
Placidus. Placidus is the most often used housing system today. Placidus is a Renaissance-era way of estimating homes based on the passage of time. It works by recording the house cusps in two-hour intervals from your birth time.
Is astrology for the entire house better?
Astro, like many other free online chart makers, offers default settings, one of which is the House system, which is set to the Placidus House System.
This isn’t limited to Astro; Co-Star and Cafe Astrology both default to Placidus.
The amount of information in a chart can be overwhelming to someone who is just getting started, and the last thing on their mind is messing around with the settings and trying to adjust their House System.
Although House Systems appear to be one of the more complicated astrological ideas that many newcomers struggle with, they are a fundamental astrological notion, thus it’s critical to have them set up from the start.
For many years, I used the default Placidus system and had excellent outcomes throughout readings.
But it wasn’t until I moved to the Whole Sign House System that everything fell into place and I was able to make significant progress.
Switching between the house systems causes major alterations in which Houses the planets fall for myself and many others.
I thought that the Whole Signs portrayed a picture of my life that I strongly related with when it came to comprehending my own chart.
This translated into my readings, where I was able to delve deeper into people’s charts with greater accuracy and comprehension.
There is no one-size-fits-all house system, but astrology is a language with many diverse dialects.
No one is more accurate than the other, but I believe it is critical for people new to astrology to be exposed to these several dialects and to choose which one they prefer.
Beginning to examine charts with entire sign houses resulted in a large number of break throughs for me.
Whole Sign Houses transforms the complete sign into a home, bringing together disparate areas of meaning in people’s lives.
I no longer have to be concerned about cusps and variations between houses because I believe Whole Signs clarifies my thinking and understanding.
One major criticism of the Whole Signs Houses is that it allows the Angls (MC/IC) to fall into houses other than the 10th house, which is their typical home.
This, in my opinion, adds additional layers of information and is useful during chart readings.
The MC is a person’s chart’s highest point, which is usually their career or the place where they are most visible.
You can gain insight into other aspects of a person’s life that are closely tied to their work and exposure by not always being in the 10th house.
I recognize that this is a dispute that will not be resolved by a single individual and that has been ongoing for many generations.
However, I believe it is critical for newcomers to be aware that there are alternatives to the default House structure.
Although I like Whole Sign Houses, I recommend that everyone test both of them, as well as the others available, to discover which one works best for them.
I recommend reading Robert Hand’s work on the matter here: link for a more extensive argument in favor of Whole Sign Houses.
Changing the House Settings in Astro Com: